eprintid: 10111393
rev_number: 12
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/10/11/13/93
datestamp: 2020-10-07 12:24:05
lastmod: 2020-10-07 12:24:05
status_changed: 2020-10-07 12:24:05
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Mitchel, P
title: Limits to measuring the bias of adapted patients: a response to Eyal
ispublished: inpress
divisions: UCL
divisions: A01
divisions: B03
divisions: C01
divisions: F16
note: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
date: 2020-09-21
date_type: published
publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
oa_status: green
full_text_type: pub
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1816590
doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa054
lyricists_name: Mitchell, Mary
lyricists_id: MMITC68
actors_name: Flynn, Bernadette
actors_id: BFFLY94
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Journal of Law and the Biosciences
issn: 2053-9711
citation:        Mitchel, P;      (2020)    Limits to measuring the bias of adapted patients: a response to Eyal.                   Journal of Law and the Biosciences        10.1093/jlb/lsaa054 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb%2Flsaa054>.    (In press).    Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10111393/1/lsaa054.pdf