UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Day Hospital Mentalization-Based Treatment versus Specialist Treatment As Usual in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial

Luyten, PJ; Laurenssen, EMP; Kikkert, MJ; Westra, D; Peen, J; Soons, MBJ; van Dam, AM; ... Dekker, JJM; + view all (2018) Day Hospital Mentalization-Based Treatment versus Specialist Treatment As Usual in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychological Medicine , 48 (15) pp. 2522-2529. 10.1017/S0033291718000132. Green open access

[thumbnail of Luyten_Laurenssen et al._ACCEPTED.pdf]
Preview
Text
Luyten_Laurenssen et al._ACCEPTED.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (525kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background. Day Hospital Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT-DH) is a promising treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), but its evidence base is still limited. This multi-site randomized trial compared the efficacy of MBT-DH versus specialist treatment as usual (S-TAU) tailored to the individual needs of patients, and offered by a well-established treatment service. Methods. Two mental healthcare institutes in the Netherlands participated in the study. Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for BPD and had a score of ≥20 on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI) were randomly allocated to MBT-DH (N=54) or S-TAU (N=41). The primary outcome variable was the total score on the BPDSI. Secondary outcome variables included symptom severity, quality of life, and interpersonal functioning. Data were collected at baseline and every 6 months until 18-month follow-up, and were analyzed using multilevel analyses based on intention-to-treat principles. Results. Both treatments were associated with significant improvements on all outcome variables. MBT-DH was not superior to S-TAU on any outcome variable. MBT-DH was associated with higher acceptability in BPD patients compared versus S-TAU, reflected in significantly higher early drop-out rates in S-TAU (34%) versus MBT-DH (9%). Conclusions. Contrary to our expectations, MBT-DH was not superior to S-TAU in the treatment of BPD at 18-month follow-up. Further research is needed to investigate treatment outcomes in the longer term and the cost-effectiveness of these treatments.

Type: Article
Title: Day Hospital Mentalization-Based Treatment versus Specialist Treatment As Usual in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718000132
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718000132
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10036594
Downloads since deposit
9,856Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item