McDermott, L; Cornelius, V; Wright, AJ; Burgess, C; Forster, A; Ashworth, M; Khoshaba, B; ... Gulliford, MC; + view all McDermott, L; Cornelius, V; Wright, AJ; Burgess, C; Forster, A; Ashworth, M; Khoshaba, B; Clery, P; Fuller, F; Miller, J; Dodhia, H; Rudisill, C; Conner, MT; Gulliford, MC; - view fewer (2018) Enhanced Invitations Using the Question-Behavior Effect and Financial Incentives to Promote Health Check Uptake in Primary Care. Annals of Behavioral Medicine , 52 (7) pp. 594-605. 10.1093/abm/kax048.

Preview	Text (Published version) McDermott et al 2018 enhanced invitation methods using the question behaviour effect.pdf - Published Version Download (410kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Supplementary data) McDermott_Enhanced_Invitations_Question-Behavior_Effect_Suppl.pdf Download (423kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uptake of health checks for cardiovascular risk assessment in primary care in England is lower than anticipated. The question-behavior effect (QBE) may offer a simple, scalable intervention to increase health check uptake. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced invitation methods employing the QBE, with or without a financial incentive to return the questionnaire, at increasing uptake of health checks. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm randomized trial including all patients at 18 general practices in two London boroughs, who were invited for health checks from July 2013 to December 2014. Participants were randomized to three trial arms: (i) Standard health check invitation letter only; (ii) QBE questionnaire followed by standard invitation letter; or (iii) QBE questionnaire with offer of a financial incentive to return the questionnaire, followed by standard invitation letter. In intention to treat analysis, the primary outcome of completion of health check within 6 months of invitation, was evaluated using a p value of .0167 for significance. RESULTS: 12,459 participants were randomized. Health check uptake was evaluated for 12,052 (97%) with outcome data collected. Health check uptake within 6 months of invitation was: standard invitation, 590 / 4,095 (14.41%); QBE questionnaire, 630 / 3,988 (15.80%); QBE questionnaire and financial incentive, 629 / 3,969 (15.85%). Difference following QBE questionnaire, 1.43% (95% confidence interval −0.12 to 2.97%, p = .070); following QBE questionnaire and financial incentive, 1.52% (−0.03 to 3.07%, p = .054). CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of health checks following a standard invitation was low and not significantly increased through enhanced invitation methods using the QBE.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item