Mintchev, ND;
(2018)
From Incommensurability to Dialogue: A Response to David Lichtenstein.
Psychoanalytic Dialogues
, 28
(2)
pp. 257-263.
10.1080/10481885.2018.1432961.
Preview |
Text
Mintchev - Psychoanalytic Dialogues - Response to David Lichtenstein (FINAL).pdf - Accepted Version Download (156kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This response to David Lichtenstein (this issue) explores the opportunities and challenges that arise from the conceptual pluralism within the field of psychoanalysis. It argues that the Kleinian and Lacanian theoretical frameworks are in many ways incommensurable, but it also maintains that this should not translate into an either/or approach that privileges one framework over the other. Acknowledging the foundational differences between Kleinian and Lacanian theories should not forestall the possibility of productive and mutually beneficial dialogue carried out in good faith.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | From Incommensurability to Dialogue: A Response to David Lichtenstein |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10481885.2018.1432961 |
| Publisher version: | http://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2018.1432961 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > UCL Institute for Global Prosperity |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10048719 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
