King, J;
Hickman, T;
Barber, N;
(2018)
Reflections on Miller.
In: Clarry, D, (ed.)
The UK Supreme Court Yearbook Volume 8: 2016-2017 Legal Year.
Appellate Press: London, UK.
Preview |
Text
Hickman Nick Barber Tom Hickman and Jeff King 'Reflections on Miller' in Daniel Clarry (ed) The UKSC Yearbook Vol 8.pdf - Published Version Download (215kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We have been invited to open the symposium in this volume of the UK Supreme Court Yearbook with some reflections on the Miller litigation, taking as our starting point our blog post, Pulling the Article 50 Trigger: Parliament’s Indispensable Role (‘the blog post’).1 As self-indulgent as it is to accept this invitation, it provides a useful opportunity to set-out the background and provide the context to the Miller litigation, before setting out our thoughts on the judgments of the Divisional Court and the UK Supreme Court (‘the Supreme Court’) themselves. Part I of this chapter examines the context, Part II explores the reasoning of the Divisional Court2 and the Supreme Court3 and Part III provides some conclusions regarding the Miller litigation.
| Type: | Book chapter |
|---|---|
| Title: | Reflections on Miller |
| ISBN-13: | 9781911250166 |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| Publisher version: | https://ukscy.org.uk/doi/10.19152/ukscy.793 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | NW Barber, Tom Hickman and Jeff King, 'Reflections on Miller' in Daniel Clarry (ed), The UK Supreme Court Yearbook, Volume 8: 2016-2017 Legal Year (Appellate Press 2018). This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10073100 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
