Blankers, M;
Koppers, D;
Laurenssen, EMP;
Peen, J;
Smits, ML;
Luyten, P;
Busschbach, J;
... Dekker, J; + view all
(2021)
Mentalization-Based Treatment Versus Specialist Treatment as Usual for Borderline Personality Disorder: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial With 36-Month Follow-Up.
Journal of Personality Disorders
, 35
(3)
pp. 373-392.
10.1521/pedi_2019_33_454.
Preview |
Text (Article)
Luyten 190614-Economic evaluation MBT-DH vs S-TAU-na-peer-review-1-clean.pdf - Accepted Version Download (542kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text (Supplementary material)
Luyten 190614-Economic evaluation MBT-DH vs S-TAU-supplements-JPD.pdf - Accepted Version Download (192kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
2019-06-14Figure-1-MBT-CEA.pdf - Accepted Version Download (286kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
2019-06-14Figure-2-MBT-CEA.pdf - Accepted Version Download (4kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
2019-06-14Figure-S1-MBT-CEA.pdf - Accepted Version Download (5kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents an economic evaluation performed alongside a randomized controlled trial of Mentalization-Based Treatment in a Day Hospital setting (MBT-DH) versus specialist treatment as usual (S-TAU) for borderline personality disorder (BPD) with a 36-month follow-up period. Ninety-five patients from two Dutch treatment institutes were randomly assigned. Societal costs were compared with the proportion of BPD remissions and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured using the five-dimensional EuroQol instrument. The incremental societal costs for one additional QALY could not be calculated. The costs for one additional BPD remission with MBT-DH are approximately €29,000. There was a 58% likelihood that MBT-DH leads to more remitted patients at additional costs compared with S-TAU, and a 35% likelihood that MBT-DH leads to more remissions at lower costs. MBT-DH is not cost-effective compared with S-TAU with QALYs as the outcome, and slightly more cost-effective than S-TAU at 36 months with BPD symptoms as the outcome.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Mentalization-Based Treatment Versus Specialist Treatment as Usual for Borderline Personality Disorder: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial With 36-Month Follow-Up |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_454 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_454 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| Keywords: | Economic evaluation, Mentalization-based treatment, Borderline personality disorder, Randomized controlled trial |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10076867 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
