Keuss, SE;
Parker, TD;
Lane, CA;
Hoskote, C;
Shah, S;
Cash, DM;
Keshavan, A;
... Schott, JM; + view all
(2019)
Incidental findings on brain imaging and blood tests: results from the first phase of Insight 46, a prospective observational substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort.
BMJ Open
, 9
(7)
, Article e029502. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029502.
Preview |
Text
Richards_Incidental findings on brain imaging and blood tests_VoR.pdf - Published Version Download (814kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective To summarise the incidental findings detected on brain imaging and blood tests during the first wave of data collection for the Insight 46 study. Design Prospective observational sub-study of a birth cohort. Setting Single-day assessment at a research centre in London, UK. Participants 502 individuals were recruited from the MRC National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), the 1946 British birth cohort, based on pre-specified eligibility criteria; mean age was 70.7 (SD: 0.7) and 49% were female. Outcome measures Data regarding the number and types of incidental findings were summarised as counts and percentages, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results 93.8% of participants completed a brain scan (n=471); 4.5% of scanned participants had a pre-defined reportable abnormality on brain MRI (n=21); suspected vascular malformations and suspected intracranial mass lesions were present in 1.9% (n=9) and 1.5% (n=7) respectively; suspected cerebral aneurysms were the single most common vascular abnormality, affecting 1.1% of participants (n=5), and suspected meningiomas were the most common intracranial lesion, affecting 0.6% of participants (n=3); 34.6% of participants had at least one abnormality on clinical blood tests (n=169), but few reached the prespecified threshold for urgent action (n=11). Conclusions In older adults, aged 69-71 years, potentially serious brain MRI findings were detected in around 5% of participants, and clinical blood test abnormalities were present in around one third of participants. Knowledge of the expected prevalence of incidental findings in the general population at this age is useful in both research and clinical settings.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
