UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Divided we stand: How contestation can facilitate institutionalization

Song, EY; (2020) Divided we stand: How contestation can facilitate institutionalization. Journal of Management Studies , 57 (4) pp. 837-866. 10.1111/joms.12532. Green open access

[thumbnail of Song_Divided we stand. How contestation can facilitate institutionalization_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Song_Divided we stand. How contestation can facilitate institutionalization_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Existing literature on institutionalization highlights that regulatory institutions emerge from resolving disputes, paying little attention to the key behavioral aspect of disputes: contestation. In this paper, I aim to advance the literature by developing a model of contestation‐based institutionalization; contestation facilitates the adoption of new regulative institutions, laws. Drawing on socio‐legal and network perspectives on the way people argue in a dispute, I focus on a behavioral code of contestation—the shared understanding and expectation about how to argue rather than what to argue. Contestation makes it easier for lawmakers to adopt a new regulatory institution when the lawmakers argue in conformity with the code. Network and event history analyses of animal lawsuits and laws in the United States from 1865 to 2010 confirm this model. This paper highlights the value of looking into the behavioral dimension of disputes and advances our understanding of institutionalization without emphasizing dispute resolution.

Type: Article
Title: Divided we stand: How contestation can facilitate institutionalization
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12532
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12532
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Behavioral code, contestation, institutionalization, regulatory institutions
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10082509
Downloads since deposit
1,562Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item