Devakumar, D; Russell, NJ; Wolfe, I; (2019) A renaissance for polymaths. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 10.1177/0141076819879682. (In press).

Preview

Text Devakumar_A renaissance for polymaths_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Download (210kB) | Preview

Abstract

In medicine, the generalist is the most common, and central, profession. Generalists are uniquely positioned to provide a comprehensive perspective and to coordinate care for the most complex and demanding problems. Their skill is in knowing enough about everything, while keeping the central purpose and humanity of care at the heart of their work. Their importance in an ever more complex world of medicine is clear.1 By contrast, generalists, or polymaths, in research and academia are rare. With increasing volumes and complexity of data and information, the sphere of specialism narrows, and the academic ivory tower grows higher and more remote from the needs and complexities of health research. The accepted narrative is that academic specialists define the cutting edge of research. Research funders generally favour supporting established world experts in their field, despite the narrowness of that field. This results in research echo chambers, where increasingly technologically sophisticated methods are applied to ever more refined questions, resulting in limited human benefit. The current model for addressing complex problems places specialists together in a multidisciplinary approach to combat siloed thinking. Boundaries are built up and then encouraged to be knocked down. But this is not always possible. We argue that research generalists or polymaths should sit at the centre of efforts to address complex problems.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item