Middlebrook, KJ; (2019) Labour Rights verus State Sovereignty: Assessing US Generalized System of Preferences Petitions as a Strategy for Advancing Labour Rights Internationally. (UCL Global Governance Institute Working Paper Series 2019/1). UCL Global Governance Institute: London, UK.

Preview

Text Middlebrook_Labour Rights versus State Sovereignty_GGI Working Paper_Final.pdf - Published Version Download (879kB) | Preview

Abstract

International efforts to promote collective-action labour rights in developing countries frequently encounter strong resistance from national political authorities framed in terms of state sovereignty. Actions in most rights-promotion arenas (transnational union-to-union solidarity, corporate social responsibility campaigns, International Labour Organization initiatives) generally pose only oblique challenges to state resistance to rights enforcement. However, US and European Union generalized system of preferences (GSP) schemes directly engage sovereignty by making countries’ enhanced access to these national and regional markets conditional upon compliance with specified labour norms. This paper assesses the efficacy of US GSP petitions against 15 developing countries, focusing on the rights to organize and bargain collectively. It finds that petitioners’ success in mobilizing political support in target countries significantly increases the effectiveness of external pressures, demonstrating how sovereignty can be leveraged to promote reforms and contributing to broader debates regarding international human rights promotion, including through labour-conditionality provisions in free-trade agreements.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item