Marcal, H; (2018) Public engagement towards sustainable heritage preservation. In: Schädler-Saub, Bogusław Szmygin, U and Szmygin, B, (eds.) Conservation Ethics Today: Are Our Conservation-Restoration Theories and Practice Ready For The 21st Century? (pp. pp. 265-290). Lublin University of Technology / International Scientific Committee for Theory and Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration (ICOMOS): Lublin, Poland.

Preview

Text Marcal_2018_HeritageforFuture(edit).pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Nowadays, heritage conservators are required to have not only a wide variety of technical but also social and human skills. The shift from a material-based conservation to an approach that focuses on subjects instead of objects (Muñoz Viñas, 2005, p. 147) is a structural approach in contemporary theories of conservation. This tendency towards subjectivity created many possibilities by exposing the multiple perspectives that surround a conservation object. At the same time, it made very clear that conservation objects are contextual and contingent (Clavir, 2009, p. 141). This dichotomy between the tangible and intangible features of a conservation object, however, has been successively overlooked in most conservation endeavours. Prior to the conservation decision-making, institutions usually identifed the main stakeholders, with publics and communities being part of that sphere together with owners, artists, and conservators, among others. The decision-making process, however, does not engage with communities in practice. This situation is very problematic for the conservation of cultural heritage objects in general, but it becomes truly hazardous for the preservation of cultural heritage with strong intangible features, such as social artistic practices, ethnographic objects, public art, participatory or performance art or even built heritage, which necessarily involves strong cooperation with communities and artists. After all, to whom are conservators preserving cultural heritage? What is the purpose of conserving cultural heritage for “future generations” if “present generations” are not called to decide in that process? This paper attempts to refect upon these questions through histories around two buildings in Lisbon that had relevant roles during the Portuguese dictatorship (1933- 1974).

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVJSONXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item