UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

A comparison of exoplanet spectroscopic retrieval tools

Barstow, JK; Changeat, Q; Garland, R; Line, MR; Rocchetto, M; Waldmann, IP; (2020) A comparison of exoplanet spectroscopic retrieval tools. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 493 (4) pp. 4884-4909. 10.1093/mnras/staa548. Green open access

[thumbnail of staa548.pdf]
Preview
Text
staa548.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (40MB) | Preview

Abstract

Over the last several years, spectroscopic observations of transiting exoplanets have begun to uncover information about their atmospheres, including atmospheric composition and indications of the presence of clouds and hazes. Spectral retrieval is the leading technique for interpretation of transmission spectra and is employed by several teams using a variety of forward models and parameter estimation algorithms. However, different model suites have mostly been used in isolation and so it is unknown whether the results from each are comparable. As we approach the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope we anticipate advances in wavelength coverage, precision, and resolution of transit spectroscopic data, so it is important that the tools that will be used to interpret these information rich spectra are validated. To this end, we present an inter-model comparison of three retrieval suites: TauREx, NEMESIS and CHIMERA. We demonstrate that the forward model spectra are in good agreement (residual deviations on the order of 20 - 40 ppm), and discuss the results of cross retrievals between the three tools. Generally, the constraints from the cross retrievals are consistent with each other and with input values to within 1 sigma However, for high precision scenarios with error envelopes of order 30 ppm, subtle differences in the simulated spectra result in discrepancies between the different retrieval suites, and inaccuracies in retrieved values of several sigma. This can be considered analogous to substantial systematic/astrophysical noise in a real observation, or errors/omissions in a forward model such as molecular linelist incompleteness or missing absorbers.

Type: Article
Title: A comparison of exoplanet spectroscopic retrieval tools
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa548
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa548
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: radiative transfer, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, techniques: spectroscopic, planets and satellites: atmospheres
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Physics and Astronomy
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10093369
Downloads since deposit
455Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item