UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT)

Wright, DM; Konstantakopoulou, E; Montesano, G; Nathwani, N; Garg, A; Garway-Heath, D; Crabb, DP; (2020) Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT). Ophthalmology , 127 (10) pp. 1313-1321. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.029. Green open access

[thumbnail of Gazzard_Wright et al Visual fields in the LiGHT study v1.8.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gazzard_Wright et al Visual fields in the LiGHT study v1.8.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (568kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To compare visual field outcomes of ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients treated with Medicine-1st against those treated with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT, Laser-1st). / Design: Secondary analysis of patients from Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT), a multicentre randomised controlled trial. / Participants and controls: 344 patients (588 eyes) treated with Medicine-1st, 344 patients (590 eyes) treated with Laser-1st. / Methods: Visual fields (VFs) were measured using standard automated perimetry and arranged in series (median length and duration: 9 VFs over 48 months). Hierarchical linear models were used to estimate pointwise VF progression rates, which were then averaged to produce a global progression estimate for each eye. Proportions of points and patients in each treatment group with fast (< -1 dB/y) or moderate (< -0.5 dB/y) progression were compared using log-binomial regression. / Main outcome measures: Pointwise and global progression rates of total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD). / Results: A greater proportion of eyes underwent moderate or fast TD progression in the Medicine-1st group compared with the Laser-1st group (26.2% vs. 16.9%; Risk Ratio, RR = 1.55 [1.23, 1.93], P < 0.001).A similar pattern was observed for pointwise rates (Medicine-1st 26.1% vs. Laser-1st 19.0%, RR = 1.37 [1.33, 1.42], P < 0.001). A greater proportion of pointwise PD rates were categorised as moderate or fast in the Medicine-1st group (Medicine-1st 11.5% vs. Laser-1st 8.3%, RR = 1.39 [1.32, 1.46], P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in the proportion of eyes that underwent moderate or fast PD progression (Medicine-1st 9.9% vs. Laser-1st 7.1%, RR = 1.39 [0.95, 2.03], P = 0.0928). / Conclusion: A slightly larger proportion of ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients treated with Medicine-1st underwent rapid VF progression compared with those treated with Laser-1st.

Type: Article
Title: Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT)
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.029
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.029
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10094694
Downloads since deposit
3,240Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item