UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer A review and secondary data analysis in Cancer Medicine has the following publication status: Published as Early View

Sieverding, M; Arbogast, L; Zimtel, S; Von Wagner, C; (2020) Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer A review and secondary data analysis in Cancer Medicine has the following publication status: Published as Early View. Cancer Medicine , 9 (20) pp. 7772-7780. 10.1002/cam4.3405. Green open access

[thumbnail of FHC paper.pdf]
Preview
Text
FHC paper.pdf - Published Version

Download (342kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Assessment of family history of cancer (FHC) mostly relies on self‐report. Our goal was to find out whether there is a systematic gender difference in self‐reported FHC. Methods: We identified nine population‐based studies which provided statistics of FHC in men and women (N1 = 404 541). Furthermore, we analyzed data (N2 = 167 154) from several iterations of the US‐based Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We calculated the proportion of positive FHC, odds ratios (OR M/F), 95% confidence intervals, and aggregated statistics. We additionally analyzed in‐depth questions about FHC from HINTS 5 Cycle 2. Results: In the reviewed studies the odds of men reporting a FHC were lower compared with the odds of women with an average OR of 0.84 [0.71; 1.00] across all studies and an OR of 0.75 [0.70; 0.80] for the six studies from the US and Europe. The gender gap was replicated in our own analyses of HINTS and NHIS with an average OR of 0.75 [0.71; 0.79]. In HINTS 5 Cycle 2 men described themselves as less familiar with their FHC and less confident answering questions regarding FHC. They were also less likely to discuss FHC with family members. Conclusions: Men— at least in the US and Europe—were consistently less likely to report FHC compared with women. Future research should investigate how the assessment of FHC can be improved to reduce these differences. Health care professionals should also consider the potential for biased reporting by gender when assessing FHC.

Type: Article
Title: Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer A review and secondary data analysis in Cancer Medicine has the following publication status: Published as Early View
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3405
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3405
Language: English
Additional information: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10108587
Downloads since deposit
1,596Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item