Liefgreen, A;
Pilditch, T;
Lagnado, D;
(2020)
Strategies for selecting and evaluating information.
Cognitive Psychology
, 123
, Article 101332. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101332.
Preview |
Text
Liefgreen et al. 2020_Manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Within the domain of psychology, Optimal Experimental Design (OED) principles have been used to model how people seek and evaluate information. Despite proving valuable as computational-level methods to account for people's behaviour, their descriptive and explanatory powers remain largely unexplored. In a series of experiments, we used a naturalistic crime investigation scenario to examine how people evaluate queries, as well as outcomes, in probabilistic contexts. We aimed to uncover the psychological strategies that people use, not just to assess whether they deviated from OED principles. In addition, we explored the adaptiveness of the identified strategies across both one-shot and stepwise information search tasks. We found that people do not always evaluate queries strictly in OED terms and use distinct strategies, such as by identifying a leading contender at the outset. Moreover, we identified aspects of zero-sum thinking and risk aversion that interact with people's information search strategies. Our findings have implications for building a descriptive account of information seeking and evaluation, accounting for factors that currently lie outside the realm of information-theoretic OED measures, such as context and the learner's own preferences.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
