UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Short-interval intracortical inhibition as a function of inter-stimulus interval: Three methods compared

Tankisi, H; Cengiz, B; Howells, J; Samusyte, G; Koltzenburg, M; Bostock, H; (2020) Short-interval intracortical inhibition as a function of inter-stimulus interval: Three methods compared. Brain Stimulation , 14 (1) pp. 22-32. 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.002. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S1935861X20302850-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S1935861X20302850-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), as measured by threshold-tracking as a function of inter-stimulus interval (ISI), has been proposed as a useful biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but its relationship to conventional amplitude measurements has not been established. / Methods: Serial tracking of SICI at increasing ISIs from 1 to 7 ms (T-SICIs) was compared in 50 healthy control subjects with the same ISIs tracked in parallel (T-SICIp), and with conventional amplitude measurements (A-SICI). For T-SICIp and A-SICI, pairs of conditioning and test stimuli with different ISIs were pseudo-randomised and interspersed with test-alone stimuli given at regular intervals. Thresholds were estimated by regression of log peak-to-peak amplitude on stimulus. / Results: T-SICIp and A-SICI were closely related: a ten-fold reduction in amplitude corresponding to an approximately 18% increase in threshold. Threshold increases were greater for T-SICIs than for T-SICIp at 3.5–5 ms (P < 0.001). This divergence depended on the initial settings and whether ISIs were progressively increased or decreased, and was attributed to the limitations of the serial tracking protocol. SICI variability between subjects was greatest for T-SICIs estimates and least for A-SICI, and only A-SICI estimates revealed a significant decline in inhibition with age. / Conclusions: The serial tracking protocol did not accurately show the dependence of inhibition on ISI. Randomising ISIs gives corresponding SICI measures, whether tracking thresholds or measuring amplitude measurements. SICI variability suggested that A-SICI measurements may be the most sensitive to loss of inhibition.

Type: Article
Title: Short-interval intracortical inhibition as a function of inter-stimulus interval: Three methods compared
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.002
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.002
Language: English
Additional information: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Short-interval intracortical inhibition; Serial versus parallel threshold-tracking TMS
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10115150
Downloads since deposit
1,716Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item