UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study

Borakati, A; Perera, A; Johnson, J; Sood, T; (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study. BMJ Open , 10 (11) 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042946. Green open access

[thumbnail of Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19 a propensity-matched database study.pdf]
Preview
Text
Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19 a propensity-matched database study.pdf - Published Version

Download (823kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the diagnostic accuracy of common imaging modalities, chest X-ray (CXR) and CT, for diagnosis of COVID-19 in the general emergency population in the UK and to find the association between imaging features and outcomes in these patients. Design: Retrospective analysis of electronic patient records. Setting Tertiary: academic health science centre and designated centre for high consequence infectious diseases in London, UK. Participants 1198 patients who attended the emergency department with paired reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) swabs for SARS-CoV-2 and CXR between 16 March and 16 April 2020. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of CXR and CT for diagnosis of COVID-19 using the British Society of Thoracic Imaging reporting templates. Reference standard was any RT-PCR positive naso-oropharyngeal swab within 30 days of attendance. ORs of CXR in association with vital signs, laboratory values and 30-day outcomes were calculated. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of CXR for COVID-19 diagnosis were 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.60) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.65), respectively. For CT scans, these were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.90) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.60), respectively. This gave a statistically significant mean increase in sensitivity with CT of 29% (95% CI 19% to 38%, p<0.0001) compared with CXR. Specificity was not significantly different between the two modalities. CXR findings: were not statistically significantly or clinically meaningfully associated with vital signs, laboratory parameters or 30-day outcomes. Conclusions: Computed tomography has substantially improved diagnostic performance over CXR in COVID-19. CT should be considered in the initial assessment for suspected COVID-19 instead of CXR if capacity allows and balanced against radiation exposure risk.

Type: Article
Title: Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042946
Language: English
Additional information: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Keywords: COVID-19, Chest imaging, accident &amp, emergency medicine, general medicine (see Internal Medicine), diagnostic radiology, CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10124249
Downloads since deposit
2,196Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item