Fanou, M;
(2020)
The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment
Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17.
Europe and the World: A law review
, 4
(1)
, Article 8. 10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26.
Preview |
Text
EWLR-4-8.pdf Download (263kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In its recent Opinion 1/17, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) examined the compatibility of an external judicial body, the Investment Court System (ICS) under the EU–Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA), with EU law. At a time when judicial independence has arisen as one of the main challenges for the rule of law in the EU, this article discusses the Court’s findings in relation to the compatibility of the ICS with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | The independence and impartiality of the hybrid CETA Investment Court System: Reflections in the aftermath of Opinion 1/17 |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2020.26 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | c 2020, Maria Fanou. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited |
| Keywords: | Opinion 1/17, judicial independence, ICS, CETA |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10124382 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
