UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Classification Criteria For Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome

Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group, .; (2021) Classification Criteria For Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome. American Journal of Ophthalmology , 228 pp. 198-204. 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.050. Green open access

[thumbnail of Dick_SUN_MS_uveitis_classification_criteria_2020.pdf]
Preview
Text
Dick_SUN_MS_uveitis_classification_criteria_2020.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (275kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose: To determine classification criteria for multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). / Design: Machine learning of cases with MEWDS and 8 other posterior uveitides. / Methods: Cases of posterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the infectious posterior/panuveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set. / Results: One thousand sixty-eight cases of posterior uveitides, including 51 cases of MEWDS, were evaluated by machine learning. Key criteria for MEWDS included: 1) multifocal gray white chorioretinal spots with foveal granularity; 2) characteristic imaging on fluorescein angiography (“wreath-like” hyperfluorescent lesions) and/or optical coherence tomography (hyper-reflective lesions extending from retinal pigment epithelium through ellipsoid zone into the retinal outer nuclear layer); and 3) absent to mild anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation. Overall accuracy for posterior uveitides was 93.9% in the training set and 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.3, 99.3) in the validation set. The misclassification rates for MEWDS were 7% in the training set and 0% in the validation set. / Conclusions: The criteria for MEWDS had a low misclassification rate and appeared to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

Type: Article
Title: Classification Criteria For Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.050
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.050
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10126647
Downloads since deposit
441Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item