Midgley, N;
Sprecher, EA;
Cirasola, A;
Redfern, S;
Pursch, B;
Smith, C;
Douglas, S;
(2021)
The reflective fostering programme: evaluating the intervention co-delivered by social work professionals and foster carers.
Journal of Children's Services
10.1108/JCS-11-2020-0074.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Midgley_Reflective Fostering Paper - Revisions JCS.pdf - Accepted Version Download (342kB) | Preview |
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is little evidence regarding how to best support the emotional well-being of children in foster care. This paper aims to present the evaluation of an adaptation of the reflective fostering programme, a group-based programme to support foster carers. This study aimed to explore whether a version of the programme, co-delivered by a social work professional and an experienced foster carer, was acceptable and relevant to foster carers and to gather data on programme effectiveness. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: In total, 38 foster carers attended the programme and took part in this study. Data was collected regarding carer- and child-focused outcomes at pre-intervention, post-intervention and four-month follow-up. Focus interviews were also conducted to further assess acceptability and relevance for foster carers. FINDINGS: Analysis of quantitative outcome showed statistically significant improvements in all outcomes considered including foster carers stress and carer-defined problems, as well as carer-reported measures of child difficulties. Focus group interviews with foster carers suggested that the programme as co-delivered by a foster carer and a social worker was felt to be relevant and helpful to foster carers. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: These results provide a unique contribution to limited understandings of what works for supporting foster carers and the children in their care. Promising evidence is provided for the acceptability and relevance of the revised version of this novel support programme and its effectiveness in terms of carer- and child-related outcome measures. This work paves the way for further necessary impact evaluation.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
