UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Uptake of slow-release oral morphine as opioid agonist treatment among hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder

Brothers, TD; Fraser, J; MacAdam, E; Morgan, B; Webster, D; (2022) Uptake of slow-release oral morphine as opioid agonist treatment among hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Review , 41 (2) pp. 430-434. 10.1111/dar.13365. Green open access

[thumbnail of Brothers_SROM_manuscript_DAR_accepted version.pdf]
Preview
Text
Brothers_SROM_manuscript_DAR_accepted version.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (255kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Buprenorphine and methadone are highly effective first-line medications for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) but are not acceptable to all patients. We aimed to assess the uptake of slow-release oral morphine (SROM) as second-line OAT among medically ill, hospitalised patients with opioid use disorder who declined buprenorphine and methadone. METHODS: This study included consecutive hospitalised patients with untreated moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder referred to an inpatient addiction medicine consultation service, between June 2018 and September 2019, in Nova Scotia, Canada. We assessed the proportion of patients initiating first-line OAT (buprenorphine or methadone) in-hospital, and the proportion initiating SROM after declining first-line OAT. We compared rates of outpatient OAT continuation (i.e., filling outpatient OAT prescription or attending first outpatient OAT clinic visit) by medication type, and compared OAT selection between patients with and without chronic pain, using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were offered OAT initiation in-hospital; six patients (18%) also had chronic pain. Twenty-one patients (62%) initiated first-line OAT with buprenorphine or methadone. Of the 13 patients who declined first-line OAT, seven (54%) initiated second-line OAT with SROM in-hospital. Rates of outpatient OAT continuation after hospital discharge were high (>80%) and did not differ between medications (P = 0.4). Patients with co-existing chronic pain were more likely to choose SROM over buprenorphine or methadone (P = 0.005). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The ability to offer SROM (in addition to buprenorphine or methadone) increased rates of OAT initiation among hospitalised patients. Increasing access to SROM would help narrow the opioid use disorder treatment gap of unmet need.

Type: Article
Title: Uptake of slow-release oral morphine as opioid agonist treatment among hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13365
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13365
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Opiate substitution treatment, opioid-related disorders, opioid epidemic, addiction medicine, hospitalists
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10131285
Downloads since deposit
90Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item