Connolly, N;
(2020)
Counterfactual arguments in unjust enrichment.
The Cambridge Law Journal
, 79
(3)
pp. 408-411.
10.1017/S0008197320000689.
Preview |
Text
Connolly_Counterfactual arguments as submitted.pdf - Accepted Version Download (99kB) | Preview |
Abstract
IN Vodafone Ltd. and Others v Office of Communications [2020] EWCA Civ 183, the Court of Appeal has considered – and rejected – counterfactual arguments advanced by the defendant in an unjust enrichment action grounded on the Woolwich unjust factor.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Counterfactual arguments in unjust enrichment |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0008197320000689 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197320000689 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10131546 |
Downloads since deposit
10,934Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
