Liefgreen, A;
Yousif, SR;
Keil, FC;
Lagnado, DA;
(2021)
Motive on the mind: Explanatory preferences at multiple stages of the legal-investigative process.
Cognition
, 217
, Article 104892. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104892.
Preview |
Text
Liefgreen_Manuscript - Cognition Revision_clean.pdf - Accepted Version Download (543kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Much work has investigated explanatory preferences for things like animals and artifacts, but how do explanation preferences manifest in everyday life? Here, we focus on the criminal justice system as a case study. In this domain, outcomes critically depend on how actors in the system (e.g., lawyers, jurors) generate and interpret explanations. We investigate lay preferences for two difference classes of information: information that appeals to opportunistic aspects of a crime (i.e., how the culprit could have committed the crime) vs. motivational aspects of that crime (i.e., the purpose for committing the crime). In two studies, we demonstrate that people prefer 'motive' accounts of crimes (analogous to a teleology preference) at different stages of the investigative process. In an additional two studies we demonstrate that these preferences are context-sensitive: namely, we find that 'motive' information tends to be more incriminating and less exculpatory. We discuss these findings in light of a broad literature on the cognitive basis of explanatory preferences; specifically, we draw analogy to preferences for teleological vs. mechanistic explanations. We also discuss implications for the criminal justice system.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
