UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Subjective well-being among psychotherapists during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A cross-cultural survey from 12 european countries

Van Hoy, Angelika; Rzeszutek, Marcin; Pięta, Małgorzata; Mestre, Jose M; Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro; Midgley, Nick; Omylinska-Thurston, Joanna; ... Gruszczyńska, Ewa; + view all (2022) Subjective well-being among psychotherapists during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A cross-cultural survey from 12 european countries. Journal of Psychiatric Research , 154 pp. 315-323. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.065. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0022395622004435-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0022395622004435-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the amount of the total variance of the subjective well-being (SWB) of psychotherapists from 12 European countries explained by between-country vs. between-person differences regarding its cognitive (life satisfaction) and affective components (positive affect [PA] and negative affect [NA]). Second, we explored a link between the SWB and their personal (self-efficacy) and social resources (social support) after controlling for sociodemographics, work characteristics, and COVID-19-related distress. METHODS: In total, 2915 psychotherapists from 12 countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Finland, Great Britain, Serbia, Spain, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden, and Switzerland) participated in this study. The participants completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (I-PANAS-SF), the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. RESULTS: Cognitive well-being (CWB; satisfaction with life) was a more country-dependent component of SWB than affective well-being (AWB). Consequently, at the individual level, significant correlates were found only for AWB but not for CWB. Higher AWB was linked to being female, older age, higher weekly workload, and lower COVID-19-related distress. Self-efficacy and social support explained AWB only, including their main effects and the moderating effect of self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight more individual characteristics of AWB compared to CWB, with a more critical role of low self-efficacy for the link between social support and PA rather than NA. This finding suggests the need for greater self-care among psychotherapists regarding their AWB and the more complex conditions underlying their CWB.

Type: Article
Title: Subjective well-being among psychotherapists during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A cross-cultural survey from 12 european countries
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.065
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.065
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: COVID-19, Cross-cultural comparison, Perceived social support, Psychotherapist, Self-efficacy, Well-being
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10155239
Downloads since deposit
80Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item