UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid-β42/40 prescreening

Rabe, Christina; Bittner, Tobias; Jethwa, Alexander; Suridjan, Ivonne; Manuilova, Ekaterina; Friesenhahn, Michel; Stomrud, Erik; ... Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative† and the Swedish Bio; + view all (2022) Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid-β42/40 prescreening. Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association 10.1002/alz.12801. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Clinical performance and robustness evaluation.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Clinical performance and robustness evaluation.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Further evidence is needed to support the use of plasma amyloid β (Aβ) biomarkers as Alzheimer's disease prescreening tools. This study evaluated the clinical performance and robustness of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 for amyloid positivity prescreening. METHODS: Data were collected from 333 BioFINDER and 121 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study participants. Risk and predictive values versus percentile of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 evaluated the actionability of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 , and simulations modeled the impact of potential uncertainties and biases. Amyloid PET was the brain amyloidosis reference standard. RESULTS: Elecsys plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 could potentially rule out amyloid pathology in populations with low-to-moderate amyloid positivity prevalence. However, simulations showed small measurement or pre-analytical errors in Aβ42 and/or Aβ40 cause misclassifications, impacting sensitivity or specificity. The minor fold change between amyloid PET positive and negative cases explains the biomarkers low robustness. DISCUSSION: Implementing plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 for routine clinical use may pose significant challenges, with misclassification risks. HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 ruled out amyloid PET positivity in a setting of low amyloid-positive prevalence. Including (pre-) analytical errors or measurement biases caused misclassifications. Plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 had a low inherent dynamic range, independent of analytical method. Other blood biomarkers may be easier to implement as robust prescreening tools.

Type: Article
Title: Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid-β42/40 prescreening
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12801
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12801
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer’s & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer’s Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, amyloid, biomarkers, blood biomarkers, prescreening
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Neurodegenerative Diseases
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10156767
Downloads since deposit
3,933Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item