Abraham, Ittai;
Jovanovic, Philipp;
Maller, Mary;
Meiklejohn, Sarah;
Stern, Gilad;
Tomescu, Alin;
(2023)
Reaching consensus for asynchronous distributed key generation.
Distributed Computing
, 36
pp. 219-252.
10.1007/s00446-022-00436-8.
Preview |
Text
Reaching_Consensus_for_Distributed_Key_Generation___Journal.pdf - Submitted Version Download (680kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We give a protocol for Asynchronous Distributed Key Generation (A-DKG) that is optimally resilient (can withstand f<n3 faulty parties), has a constant expected number of rounds, has O(λn3) expected communication complexity, and assumes only the existence of a PKI. Prior to our work, the best A-DKG protocols required Ω(n) expected number of rounds, and Ω(n4) expected communication. Our A-DKG protocol relies on several building blocks that are of independent interest. We define and design a Proposal Election (PE) protocol that allows parties to retrospectively agree on a valid proposal after enough proposals have been sent from different parties. With constant probability the elected proposal was proposed by a nonfaulty party. In building our PE protocol, we design a Verifiable Gather protocol which allows parties to communicate which proposals they have and have not seen in a verifiable manner. The final building block to our A-DKG is a Validated Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement (VABA) protocol. We use our PE protocol to construct a VABA protocol that does not require leaders or an asynchronous DKG setup. Our VABA protocol can be used more generally when it is not possible to use threshold signatures.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Reaching consensus for asynchronous distributed key generation |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00446-022-00436-8 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-022-00436-8 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Distributed computing, Distributed key generation, Consensus, Byzantine adversary, Asynchrony |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10157574 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |