UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an acute general hospital setting

Dunford, Emma; West, Emily; Sampson, Elizabeth L; (2022) Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an acute general hospital setting. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry , 37 (12) 10.1002/gps.5830. Green open access

[thumbnail of Int J Geriat Psychiatry - 2022 - Dunford - Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an.pdf]
Preview
Text
Int J Geriat Psychiatry - 2022 - Dunford - Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an.pdf - Published Version

Download (288kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with dementia are at risk of unplanned hospital admissions and commonly have painful conditions. Identifying pain is challenging and may lead to undertreatment. The psychometric properties of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale, in medical inpatients with dementia have not been evaluated. METHODS: A secondary data analysis from a longitudinal study of 230 people with dementia admitted to two acute general hospitals in London, UK. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, construct validity and discriminant validity of PAINAD were tested at rest and in movement. RESULTS: This predominantly female (65.7%) sample had a mean age of 87.2 (Standard Deviation; SD = 5.92) years. Inter-rater reliability showed an intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.92 at rest and 0.98 in movement, test-retest reliability ICC was 0.54 at rest and 0.66 in movement. Internal consistency was 0.76 at rest and 0.80 in movement (Cronbach's α). Concurrent validity was weak between PAINAD and a self-rating level of pain (Kendall's Tau; τ = 0.29; p > 0.001). There was no correlation between PAINAD and a measure of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, suggesting no evidence of convergent validity. PAINAD scores were higher during movement than rest, providing evidence of discriminant validity (z = -8.01, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was modest. This study raises concerns about the validity of the PAINAD in general acute hospitals. This provides an insight into pain assessment in general acute hospitals which may inform further refinements of the PAINAD.

Type: Article
Title: Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale in an acute general hospital setting
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5830
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5830
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: Dementia, hospitals, pain assessment, reliability, validity
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry > Marie Curie Palliative Care
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10159872
Downloads since deposit
16,492Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item