Hui, Lai Ling;
Ho, Frederick K;
Wright, Charlotte Margaret;
Cole, Tim J;
Lam, Hugh Simon;
Deng, Han-Bing;
So, Hung-Kwan;
... Nelson, E Anthony S; + view all
(2023)
World variation in head circumference for children from birth to 5 years and a comparison with the WHO standards.
Archives of Disease in Childhood
10.1136/archdischild-2022-324661.
(In press).
Preview |
PDF
289515.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A recent review reported that the WHO 2006 growth standards reflect a smaller head circumference at 24 months than seen in 18 countries. Whether this happens in early infancy and to what extent populations differ is not clear. This scooping review aimed to estimate the rates of children in different populations identified as macrocephalic or microcephalic by WHO standards. METHODS: We reviewed population-representative head circumference-for-age references. For each reference, we calculated the percentages of head circumferences that would be classified as microcephalic (<3rd WHO centile) or macrocephalic (>97th WHO centile) at selected ages. RESULTS: Twelve references from 11 countries/regions (Belgium, China, Ethiopia, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Norway, Saudi Arabia, UK and USA) were included. Median head circumference was larger than that for the Multicentre Growth Reference Study populations in both sexes in all these populations except for Japanese and Chinese children aged 1 month and Indians. Overall, at 12/24 months, 8%-9% children would be classified as macrocephalic and 2% would be classified as microcephalic, compared with the expected 3%. However at 1 month, there were geographic differences in the rate of macrocephaly (6%-10% in Europe vs 1%-2% in Japan and China) and microcephaly (1%-3% vs 6%-14%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Except for Indians and some Asian neonates, adopting the WHO head circumference standards would overdiagnose macrocephaly and underdiagnose microcephaly. Local population-specific cut-offs or references are more appropriate for many populations. There is a need to educate healthcare professionals about the limitations of the WHO head circumference standards.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | World variation in head circumference for children from birth to 5 years and a comparison with the WHO standards |
| Location: | England |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324661 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-324661 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| Keywords: | Child development, growth |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10167534 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
