DiazOrdaz, K;
(2022)
Discussion on: Instrumented difference-in-differences, by Ting Ye, Ashkan Ertefaie, James Flory, Sean Hennessy and Dylan S. Small.
Biometrics
10.1111/biom.13785.
(In press).
Preview |
PDF
Discussion on Instrumented difference in differences.pdf - Published Version Download (168kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I discuss the assumptions needed for identification of average treatment effects and local average treatment effects in instrumented difference-in-differences (IDID), and the possible trade-offs between assumptions of standard IV and those needed for the new proposal IDID, in one- and two-sample settings. I also discuss the interpretation of the estimands identified under monotonicity. I conclude by suggesting possible extensions to the estimation method, by outlining a strategy to use data-adaptive estimation of the nuisance parameters, based on recent developments.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Discussion on: Instrumented difference-in-differences, by Ting Ye, Ashkan Ertefaie, James Flory, Sean Hennessy and Dylan S. Small |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1111/biom.13785 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13785 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2022 The Authors. Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Biometric Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Keywords: | causal inference, causal machine learning, difference in difference, instrumental variables |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Statistical Science |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10167840 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |