UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II: Practical considerations and guidance

Choodari-Oskooei, Babak; Robertson, David S; Dimairo, Munya; Flight, Laura; Pallmann, Philip; Jaki, Thomas; (2023) Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II: Practical considerations and guidance. Statistics in Medicine , 42 (14) pp. 2496-2520. 10.1002/sim.9734. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Statistics in Medicine - 2023 - Robertson - Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II  Practical considerations and.pdf]
Preview
Text
Statistics in Medicine - 2023 - Robertson - Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II Practical considerations and.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

In adaptive clinical trials, the conventional end-of-trial point estimate of a treatment effect is prone to bias, that is, a systematic tendency to deviate from its true value. As stated in recent FDA guidance on adaptive designs, it is desirable to report estimates of treatment effects that reduce or remove this bias. However, it may be unclear which of the available estimators are preferable, and their use remains rare in practice. This article is the second in a two-part series that studies the issue of bias in point estimation for adaptive trials. Part I provided a methodological review of approaches to remove or reduce the potential bias in point estimation for adaptive designs. In part II, we discuss how bias can affect standard estimators and assess the negative impact this can have. We review current practice for reporting point estimates and illustrate the computation of different estimators using a real adaptive trial example (including code), which we use as a basis for a simulation study. We show that while on average the values of these estimators can be similar, for a particular trial realization they can give noticeably different values for the estimated treatment effect. Finally, we propose guidelines for researchers around the choice of estimators and the reporting of estimates following an adaptive design. The issue of bias should be considered throughout the whole lifecycle of an adaptive design, with the estimation strategy prespecified in the statistical analysis plan. When available, unbiased or bias-reduced estimates are to be preferred.

Type: Article
Title: Point estimation for adaptive trial designs II: Practical considerations and guidance
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9734
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9734
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: adaptive design, bias-correction, conditional bias, point estimation, unconditional bias
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology > MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10167874
Downloads since deposit
7,752Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item