UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Existential Ethics: Thinking Hard About Lawyer Responsibility for Clients’ Environmental Harms

Vaughan, Steven; (2023) Existential Ethics: Thinking Hard About Lawyer Responsibility for Clients’ Environmental Harms. Current Legal Problems 10.1093/clp/cuad005. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of cuad005-3.pdf]
Preview
PDF
cuad005-3.pdf - Published Version

Download (281kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper challenges the conventional understanding among many legal ethicists that environmental harm can be a necessary, if regrettable, collateral effect of lawyerly work. It argues that lawyers sometimes do things that cost society too much and that legal ethics (being the rules of ethical conduct set out by regulators of lawyers and broader theories of ‘good’ lawyering) has the potential to act as a mediator on lawyers’ environmental harm-causing action. The paper begins by examining lawyers’ formal rules of professional conduct in England & Wales, showing how those rules require lawyers to provide active counselling to clients but do not fully address clients’ legally permissible choices that may result in environmental harm. The paper then turns to theories of legal ethics that go beyond these baseline rules. Here, I argue that the dominant ‘Standard Conception’ of lawyers as neutral technicians is not only implausible in the context of environmental law but also fundamentally incomplete. The paper also considers the ethical implications of a lawyer’s initial decision to represent a client. The commonly held belief that ‘Everyone deserves legal advice’ often masks a simple ethical choice, where lawyers prioritise commercial concerns over environmental considerations, unburdened by more complex ethical constraints. However, this rationalisation rests on unsound premises and frequently clashes with lawyers’ personal moral boundaries; a problem I label ‘Meatloaf Lawyering’. Ultimately, I argue that lawyers have significant ethical agency and that their professional obligations do not impede (and sometimes require) an active, ethically responsible stance towards environmental harms.

Type: Article
Title: Existential Ethics: Thinking Hard About Lawyer Responsibility for Clients’ Environmental Harms
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/clp/cuad005
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuad005
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10171703
Downloads since deposit
4,680Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item