UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Profiling UK injectable aesthetic practitioners: a national cohort analysis

Zargaran, David; Zargaran, Alexander; Terranova, Tom; Khaledi, Helia; Robinson, Alexandra; Davies, Julie; Weyrich, Tim; (2023) Profiling UK injectable aesthetic practitioners: a national cohort analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.057. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S1748681523003765-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S1748681523003765-main.pdf

Download (975kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: The United Kingdom (UK) injectables market has been growing rapidly with a lack of robust regulation and to date, no information regarding the profile of practitioners has been published. Aim: We aim to provide a descriptive and qualitative analysis of the advertised practitioners in the United Kingdom. Methods: We performed a systematic search using the internet search engine Google to perform a qualitative descriptive analysis of aesthetic practitioners in the UK. For each contiguous country in the UK: England, Scotland, and Wales, five searches were performed. The list of practitioners was then cross-referenced with professional regulatory bodies, with extraction of registration number, date of registration and presence or absence from the Specialist Register or General Practitioner register. Results: 3,000 websites were visited and evaluated. 1,224 independent clinics with 4,405 practitioners were identified. 738 were identified as those in business support functions and the remaining 3,667 practitioners were undertaking injectable practice. The profile of professions were doctors 32%, nurses 13%, dentists 24% and dental nurses 8%. Of the 1,163 doctors identified 481 were on the specialist register (41%) and 219 were on the GP register (19%). 27 specialties were represented in this cohort analysis. Plastic Surgery formed the majority of those who were on the specialist register at 37%, followed by Dermatology at 18%. Conclusion: This paper is the first to describe the range of practitioners, their professional backgrounds and experience who perform non-surgical aesthetic interventions. The range of backgrounds may have an impact on the potential risks to patients and will be an important consideration in proposed legislation to introduce licensing to the industry.

Type: Article
Title: Profiling UK injectable aesthetic practitioners: a national cohort analysis
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.057
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.057
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: Public health, patient safety, legislation, Botulinum Toxin, Dermal filler
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10173093
Downloads since deposit
250Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item