Cavallaro, FL;
Cannings-John, R;
Lugg-Widger, F;
Gilbert, R;
Kennedy, E;
Kendall, S;
Robling, M;
(2023)
Lessons learned from using linked administrative data to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership in England and Scotland.
International Journal of Population Data Science
, 8
(1)
, Article 10. 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2113.
Preview |
PDF
2113.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction “Big data” – including linked administrative data – can be exploited to evaluate interventions for maternal and child health, providing time- and cost-effective alternatives to randomised controlled trials. However, using these data to evaluate population-level interventions can be challenging. Objectives We aimed to inform future evaluations of complex interventions by describing sources of bias, lessons learned, and suggestions for improvements, based on two observational studies using linked administrative data from health, education and social care sectors to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) in England and Scotland. Methods We first considered how different sources of potential bias within the administrative data could affect results of the evaluations. We explored how each study design addressed these sources of bias using maternal confounders captured in the data. We then determined what additional information could be captured at each step of the complex intervention to enable analysts to minimise bias and maximise comparability between intervention and usual care groups, so that any observed differences can be attributed to the intervention. Results Lessons learned include the need for i) detailed data on intervention activity (dates/geography) and usual care; ii) improved information on data linkage quality to accurately characterise control groups; iii) more efficient provision of linked data to ensure timeliness of results; iv) better measurement of confounding characteristics affecting who is eligible, approached and enrolled. Conclusions Linked administrative data are a valuable resource for evaluations of the FNP national programme and other complex population-level interventions. However, information on local programme delivery and usual care are required to account for biases that characterise those who receive the intervention, and to inform understanding of mechanisms of effect. National, ongoing, robust evaluations of complex public health evaluations would be more achievable if programme implementation was integrated with improved national and local data collection, and robust quasi-experimental designs.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Lessons learned from using linked administrative data to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership in England and Scotland |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2113 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2113 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Keywords: | Administrative data; cross-sectoral linkage; evaluation; early years; adolescent motherhood |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10174449 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
