Platts, PJ;
Schaafsma, M;
Turner, RK;
Burgess, ND;
Fisher, B;
Mbilinyi, BP;
Munishi, PKT;
... Balmford, A; + view all
(2023)
Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot.
Environmental and Resource Economics
10.1007/s10640-023-00798-y.
(In press).
Preview |
PDF
s10640-023-00798-y.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
A billion rural people live near tropical forests. Urban populations need them for water, energy and timber. Global society benefits from climate regulation and knowledge embodied in tropical biodiversity. Ecosystem service valuations can incentivise conservation, but determining costs and benefits across multiple stakeholders and interacting services is complex and rarely attempted. We report on a 10-year study, unprecedented in detail and scope, to determine the monetary value implications of conserving forests and woodlands in Tanzania’s Eastern Arc Mountains. Across plausible ranges of carbon price, agricultural yield and discount rate, conservation delivers net global benefits (+US$8.2B present value, 20-year central estimate). Crucially, however, net outcomes diverge widely across stakeholder groups. International stakeholders gain most from conservation (+US$10.1B), while local-rural communities bear substantial net costs (-US$1.9B), with greater inequities for more biologically important forests. Other Tanzanian stakeholders experience conflicting incentives: tourism, drinking water and climate regulation encourage conservation (+US$72M); logging, fuelwood and management costs encourage depletion (-US$148M). Substantial global investment in disaggregating and mitigating local costs (e.g., through boosting smallholder yields) is essential to equitably balance conservation and development objectives.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10640-023-00798-y |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00798-y |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| Keywords: | Biodiversity hotspot · Distribution analysis · Opportunity costs · Conservation · Cost-benefit analysis · Tanzania |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Geography |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10175991 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
