Hallam, L;
Vassallo, A;
Pinho-Gomes, AC;
Carcel, C;
Woodward, M;
(2022)
Does Journal Content in the Field of Women's Health Represent Women's Burden of Disease? A Review of Publications in 2010 and 2020.
Journal of Women's Health
, 31
(5)
pp. 611-619.
10.1089/jwh.2021.0425.
Preview |
PDF
Does Journal Content in the Field of Womens Health Represent Womens Burden of Disease A Review of Publications in 2010 and 2.pdf - Published Version Download (585kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Historically, women's health has focused on reproductive health. However, noncommunicable and communicable diseases comprise much of the burden of disease in women. Methods: A quantitative analysis of the main health content of articles published in six women's health journals (WHJ) and five general medical journals (GMJ) in 2010 and 2020 was conducted to categorize the main medical area topics of published articles and the life stage under study. Findings were compared with the leading causes of disease in women according to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Results: There were 1483 articles eligible for analysis. In total, in WHJ, 44% of topics were reproductive health, increasing from 36% in 2010 to 49% in 2020, which was similar to GMJ. Noncommunicable disease was the next most addressed topic, with cancer being the major disease area covered. When compared with the GBD study, major disease areas such as infectious disease, cardiovascular disease, and musculoskeletal disorders were underrepresented as topics in women's health publications. Most articles that focused on a particular life stage were on pregnancy or the reproductive years, with very few articles on menopause. Conclusion: Women's health publishing remains largely focused on reproductive health topics, with few articles on many of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in women. Journals, researchers, funders, and research priority setters should embrace a broader view of women's health to effectively cover content that reflects the broad range of health issues impacting women across the life span.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Does Journal Content in the Field of Women's Health Represent Women's Burden of Disease? A Review of Publications in 2010 and 2020 |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1089/jwh.2021.0425 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0425 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Keywords: | Global burden of disease, noncommunicable disease, reproductive health, women's health, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cost of Illness, Female, Humans, Menopause, Morbidity, Pregnancy, Women's Health |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics > Infectious Disease Informatics |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10176852 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |