UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Comparison of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Approaches for Relative Binding Free Energy Predictions

Wan, Shunzhou; Bhati, Agastya P; Coveney, Peter V; (2023) Comparison of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Approaches for Relative Binding Free Energy Predictions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00842. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of wan-et-al-2023-comparison-of-equilibrium-and-nonequilibrium-approaches-for-relative-binding-free-energy-predictions.pdf]
Preview
Text
wan-et-al-2023-comparison-of-equilibrium-and-nonequilibrium-approaches-for-relative-binding-free-energy-predictions.pdf - Published Version

Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

Alchemical relative binding free energy calculations have recently found important applications in drug optimization. A series of congeneric compounds are generated from a preidentified lead compound, and their relative binding affinities to a protein are assessed in order to optimize candidate drugs. While methods based on equilibrium thermodynamics have been extensively studied, an approach based on nonequilibrium methods has recently been reported together with claims of its superiority. However, these claims pay insufficient attention to the basis and reliability of both methods. Here we report a comparative study of the two approaches across a large data set, comprising more than 500 ligand transformations spanning in excess of 300 ligands binding to a set of 14 diverse protein targets. Ensemble methods are essential to quantify the uncertainty in these calculations, not only for the reasons already established in the equilibrium approach but also to ensure that the nonequilibrium calculations reside within their domain of validity. If and only if ensemble methods are applied, we find that the nonequilibrium method can achieve accuracy and precision comparable to those of the equilibrium approach. Compared to the equilibrium method, the nonequilibrium approach can reduce computational costs but introduces higher computational complexity and longer wall clock times. There are, however, cases where the standard length of a nonequilibrium transition is not sufficient, necessitating a complete rerun of the entire set of transitions. This significantly increases the computational cost and proves to be highly inconvenient during large-scale applications. Our findings provide a key set of recommendations that should be adopted for the reliable implementation of nonequilibrium approaches to relative binding free energy calculations in ligand-protein systems.

Type: Article
Title: Comparison of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Approaches for Relative Binding Free Energy Predictions
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00842
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00842
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY 4.0.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Chemistry
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10179708
Downloads since deposit
750Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item