Leichsenring, Falk;
Steinert, Christiane;
Luyten, Patrick;
Heim, Nikolas;
(2024)
Originalbeiträge (Originals). Network meta-analysis: science or alchemy? –What works best in generalized anxiety disorder?
Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
, 70
(2)
pp. 106-111.
10.13109/zptm.2024.70.2.106.
Preview |
Text
Luyten_Comment network meta-analysis GAD (11) - extended.pdf Download (302kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recently Papola et al. (2023) published a network meta-analysis (NMA) on psychotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and concluded that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) should be considered the first-line treatment for GAD. However, there are several concerns with regard to the procedures and the conclusions of this NMA and of NMA in general. We show that these concerns question the conclusions by Papola et al. Furthermore, we place concerns about thisNMAin a broader context and question whether existing evidence is consistent with the notion that one form of psychotherapy can be regarded as the gold standard for mental disorders and for all patients and therapists.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
