Bonello, Joseph; Orengo, Christine; (2024) FunPredCATH: An ensemble method for predicting protein function using CATH. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom , 1872 (2) , Article 140985. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2023.140985.

Preview

PDF 1-s2.0-S1570963923000997-main.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The growth of unannotated proteins in UniProt increases at a very high rate every year due to more efficient sequencing methods. However, the experimental annotation of proteins is a lengthy and expensive process. Using computational techniques to narrow the search can speed up the process by providing highly specific Gene Ontology (GO) terms. METHODOLOGY: We propose an ensemble approach that combines three generic base predictors that predict Gene Ontology (BP, CC and MF) terms from sequences across different species. We train our models on UniProtGOA annotation data and use the CATH domain resources to identify the protein families. We then calculate a score based on the prevalence of individual GO terms in the functional families that is then used as an indicator of confidence when assigning the GO term to an uncharacterised protein. METHODS: In the ensemble, we use a statistics-based method that scores the occurrence of GO terms in a CATH FunFam against a background set of proteins annotated by the same GO term. We also developed a set-based method that uses Set Intersection and Set Union to score the occurrence of GO terms within the same CATH FunFam. Finally, we also use FunFams-Plus, a predictor method developed by the Orengo Group at UCL to predict GO terms for uncharacterised proteins in the CAFA3 challenge. EVALUATION: We evaluated the methods against the CAFA3 benchmark and DomFun. We used the Precision, Recall and Fmax metrics and the benchmark datasets that are used in CAFA3 to evaluate our models and compare them to the CAFA3 results. Our results show that FunPredCATH compares well with top CAFA methods in the different ontologies and benchmarks. CONTRIBUTIONS: FunPredCATH compares well with other prediction methods on CAFA3, and the ensemble approach outperforms the base methods. We show that non-IEA models obtain higher Fmax scores than the IEA counterparts, while the models including IEA annotations have higher coverage at the expense of a lower Fmax score.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item