UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Can listeners predict whether or not a stutter follows a stretch of fluent speech?

Liu, Xiner; Howell, Peter; (2024) Can listeners predict whether or not a stutter follows a stretch of fluent speech? Journal of Fluency Disorders , 79 , Article 106038. 10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106038.

[thumbnail of Howell_R3_manuscript_final_+2.pdf] Text
Howell_R3_manuscript_final_+2.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 23 September 2025.

Download (332kB)

Abstract

Purpose: Neurophysiological studies report that people who stutter (PWS) exhibit enhanced motor preparation before they stutter. This motor preparation pattern raises the possibility of detecting upcoming stutter moments before they actually occur. This study examined whether these motor preparation differences are detectable by listeners in the corresponding acoustic signal, thereby allowing them to predict upcoming stuttering moments. If so, features in these acoustic patterns could potentially be employed by computational procedures to automate detection of upcoming stutters and to target auditory feedback alterations specifically on these locations.// Methods: Forty healthy normal-hearing participants (aged 18–30) listened to seemingly fluent speech extracts each of which was either followed by a fluent (control condition) or stuttered (experimental condition) moment after the fluent extract. Participants listened to each extract and rated the likelihood of the speaker stuttering on the next word on a scale of 1 (very unlikely) to 7 (very likely) as to whether they thought there was a subsequent stutter. Several measures were made on the speech extracts which were examined either as control requirements to ensure no differences between experimental and control material or as covariates to assess any effects they had on judgments between the two conditions.// Results: Listeners gave significantly higher stutter-likelihood ratings for speech originally followed by a stuttered moment although effects were small.// Conclusions: Naive listeners rated speech extracts that were subsequently followed by stuttered moments as more likely to be followed by a stutter than those that were followed by fluent words after the effects of significant covariates were excluded.

Type: Article
Title: Can listeners predict whether or not a stutter follows a stretch of fluent speech?
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106038
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106038
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Developmental stuttering, Automatic recognition of stutters, Stuttered speech, Diversity
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10185846
Downloads since deposit
10Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item