UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour

Bond, Melissa; Khosravi, Hassan; De Laat, Maarten; Bergdahl, Nina; Negrea, Violeta; Oxley, Emily; Pham, Phuong; ... Siemens, George; + view all (2024) A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 21 , Article 4. 10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z. Green open access

[thumbnail of Bond et al. 2024 - AI in Higher Education Review of Reviews.pdf]
Preview
Text
Bond et al. 2024 - AI in Higher Education Review of Reviews.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Although the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has a substantial history as a research domain, never before has the rapid evolution of AI applications in education sparked such prominent public discourse. Given the already rapidly growing AIEd literature base in higher education, now is the time to ensure that the field has a solid research and conceptual grounding. This review of reviews is the first comprehensive meta review to explore the scope and nature of AIEd in higher education (AIHEd) research, by synthesising secondary research (e.g., systematic reviews), indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOHost, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect and ACM Digital Library, or captured through snowballing in OpenAlex, ResearchGate and Google Scholar. Reviews were included if they synthesised applications of AI solely in formal higher or continuing education, were published in English between 2018 and July 2023, were journal articles or full conference papers, and if they had a method section 66 publications were included for data extraction and synthesis in EPPI Reviewer, which were predominantly systematic reviews (66.7%), published by authors from North America (27.3%), conducted in teams (89.4%) in mostly domestic-only collaborations (71.2%). Findings show that these reviews mostly focused on AIHEd generally (47.0%) or Profiling and Prediction (28.8%) as thematic foci, however key findings indicated a predominance of the use of Adaptive Systems and Personalisation in higher education. Research gaps identified suggest a need for greater ethical, methodological, and contextual considerations within future research, alongside interdisciplinary approaches to AIHEd application. Suggestions are provided to guide future primary and secondary research.

Type: Article
Title: A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Language: English
Additional information: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Artifcial Intelligence, AIEd, AI, Evidence synthesis, Tertiary review, Research methods, Quality assessment, Intelligent tutoring systems, Adaptive systems, Prediction, Personalisation, Automatic assessment
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10185878
Downloads since deposit
1,680Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item