Abraham, Haim;
(2024)
Myths and Misconceptions in Extraterritorial Torts.
University of Toronto Law Journal
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Abraham_Myths and Misconcentions Revised[26022024].pdf Download (400kB) | Preview |
Abstract
States’ ability to impose liability for extraterritorial torts is often structured to avoid an illegitimate assertion of authority by one state over another. However, the resulting liability regimes are inconsistent and difficult to justify. In this paper, I argue that limitations of liability in this context have been based on misconceptions about abuse of power. I employ instrumental and rights-based approaches to states’ authority to demarcate a coherent framework for states’ liability for extraterritorial torts. I show that courts can impose liability on their own state and officials for extraterritorial torts as authority is not exerted over a foreign state. Liability can also be imposed on foreign states for their extraterritorial torts through consent, a sufficient jurisdictional connection to the tort, or the establishment of universal jurisdiction by a breach of jus cogens norms. Lastly, I assert that punitive damages are generally an illegitimate form of exerting authority.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Myths and Misconceptions in Extraterritorial Torts |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| Publisher version: | https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/utlj |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10188079 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
