UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis

Rabben, Jannicke; Vivat, Bella; Fossum, Mariann; Rohde, Gudrun Elin; (2024) Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis. Palliative Medicine 10.1177/02692163241238384. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of rabben-et-al-2024-shared-decision-making-in-palliative-cancer-care-a-systematic-review-and-metasynthesis.pdf]
Preview
PDF
rabben-et-al-2024-shared-decision-making-in-palliative-cancer-care-a-systematic-review-and-metasynthesis.pdf - Published Version

Download (472kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a key element of person-centred care and promoted as the favoured model in preference-sensitive decision-making. Limitations to implementation have been observed, and barriers and limitations, both generally and in the palliative setting, have been highlighted. More knowledge about the process of shared decision-making in palliative cancer care would assist in addressing these limitations. AIM: To identify and synthesise qualitative data on how people with cancer, informal carers and healthcare professionals experience and perceive shared decision-making in palliative cancer care. DESIGN: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. We analysed data using inductive thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus) from inception until June 2023, supplemented by backward searches. RESULTS: We identified and included 23 studies, reported in 26 papers. Our analysis produced four analytical themes; (1) Overwhelming situation of 'no choice', (2) Processes vary depending on the timings and nature of the decisions involved, (3) Patient-physician dyad is central to decision-making, with surrounding support and (4) Level of involvement depends on interactions between individuals and systems. CONCLUSION: Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care is a complex process of many decisions in a challenging, multifaceted and evolving situation where equipoise and choice are limited. Implications for practice: Implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice requires (1) clarifying conceptual confusion, (2) including members of the interprofessional team in the shared decision-making process and (3) adapting the approach to the ambiguous, existential situations which arise in palliative cancer care.

Type: Article
Title: Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/02692163241238384
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241238384
Language: English
Additional information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages
Keywords: Decision making, neoplasms, palliative care, qualitative research, shared decision making, systematic review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry > Marie Curie Palliative Care
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10189442
Downloads since deposit
456Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item