UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

A comparison of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linkage using standard or personalised keratometry thresholds

Li, Ji-Peng Olivia; Maile, Howard P; Bunce, Catey; Kandakji, Lynn; Leucci, Marcello T; Allan, Bruce D; Tuft, Stephen J; ... Gore, Daniel M; + view all (2024) A comparison of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linkage using standard or personalised keratometry thresholds. Eye , 38 pp. 1681-1686. 10.1038/s41433-024-02994-6. Green open access

[thumbnail of 40939_2_art_0_s8spg2.pdf]
Preview
Text
40939_2_art_0_s8spg2.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (495kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define how estimates of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linking (CXL) vary according to the parameter selected to measure corneal shape. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated progression following CXL in 1677 eyes. We compared standard definitions of keratoconus progression based on published thresholds for Kmax, front K2, or back K2, or progression of any two of these three parameters, with the option of an increased threshold for Kmax values ≥ 55D. As corneal thickness reduces unpredictably after CXL, it was excluded from the principal analysis. We then repeated the analysis using novel adaptive estimates of progression for Kmax, front K2, or back K2, developed separately using 6463 paired readings from keratoconus eyes, with a variation of the Bland–Altman method to determine the 95% regression-based limits of agreement (LoA). We created Kaplan-Meier survival plots for both standard and adaptive thresholds. The primary outcome was progression five years after a baseline visit 9–15 months following CXL. RESULTS: Progression rates were 8% with a standard (≥ 1.5D) threshold for K2 or 6% with the static multi-parameter definition. With a ≥ 1D threshold for Kmax, the progression was significantly higher at 29%. With adaptive Kmax or K2, the progression rates were similar (20%) but less than with the adaptive multi-parameter method (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of keratoconus progression following CXL vary widely according to the reference criteria. Using adaptive thresholds (LoA) to define the repeatability of keratometry gives estimates for progression that are markedly higher than with the standard multi-parameter method.

Type: Article
Title: A comparison of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linkage using standard or personalised keratometry thresholds
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-02994-6
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02994-6
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Biological techniques, Corneal diseases
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10189642
Downloads since deposit
210Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item