UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

What predicts citation counts and translational impact in headache research? A machine learning analysis

Danelakis, Antonios; Langseth, Helge; Nachev, Parashkev; Nelson, Amy; Bjørk, Marte-Helene; Matharu, Manjit S; Tronvik, Erling; ... Stubberud, Anker; + view all (2024) What predicts citation counts and translational impact in headache research? A machine learning analysis. Cephalalgia , 44 (5) 10.1177/03331024241251488. Green open access

[thumbnail of danelakis-et-al-2024-what-predicts-citation-counts-and-translational-impact-in-headache-research-a-machine-learning.pdf]
Preview
PDF
danelakis-et-al-2024-what-predicts-citation-counts-and-translational-impact-in-headache-research-a-machine-learning.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop the first machine learning models to predict citation counts and the translational impact, defined as inclusion in guidelines or policy documents, of headache research, and assess which factors are most predictive. METHODS: Bibliometric data and the titles, abstracts, and keywords from 8600 publications in three headache-oriented journals from their inception to 31 December 2017 were used. A series of machine learning models were implemented to predict three classes of 5-year citation count intervals (0-5, 6-14 and, >14 citations); and the translational impact of a publication. Models were evaluated out-of-sample with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: The top performing gradient boosting model predicted correct citation count class with an out-of-sample AUC of 0.81. Bibliometric data such as page count, number of references, first and last author citation counts and h-index were among the most important predictors. Prediction of translational impact worked optimally when including both bibliometric data and information from the title, abstract and keywords, reaching an out-of-sample AUC of 0.71 for the top performing random forest model. CONCLUSION: Citation counts are best predicted by bibliometric data, while models incorporating both bibliometric data and publication content identifies the translational impact of headache research.

Type: Article
Title: What predicts citation counts and translational impact in headache research? A machine learning analysis
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/03331024241251488
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024241251488
Language: English
Additional information: Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, deep learning, neural networks, prediction, translational, Machine Learning, Bibliometrics, Humans, Headache, Biomedical Research, Translational Research, Biomedical, Journal Impact Factor
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Brain Repair and Rehabilitation
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10191951
Downloads since deposit
456Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item