Parker, Adam J;
Hontaru, Maria-Elisabeta;
Lin, Rachel;
Ollerenshaw, Sophie;
Bonandrini, Rolando;
(2024)
Opposite perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks are unique to consonant–vowel strings and are unlikely a consequence of repetition.
Laterality
10.1080/1357650x.2024.2348832.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Opposite perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks are unique to consonant vowel strings and are unlikely a consequence of repetition.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite wide reporting of a right ear (RE) advantage on dichotic listening tasks and a right visual field (RVF) advantage on visual half-field tasks, we know very little about the relationship between these perceptual biases. Previous studies that have investigated perceptual asymmetries for analogous auditory and visual consonant–vowel tasks have indicated a serendipitous finding: a RE advantage and a left visual field (LVF) advantage with poor cross-modal correlations. In this study, we examined the possibility that this LVF advantage for visual processing of consonant–vowel strings may be a consequence of repetition by examining perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks for both consonant–vowel strings and words. We replicated opposite perceptual biases for consonant–vowel strings (RE and LVF advantages). This did not extend to word stimuli where we found RE and RVF advantages. Furthermore, these perceptual biases did not differ across the three experimental blocks. Thus, we can firmly conclude that this LVF advantage is unique to consonant–vowel strings and is not a consequence of the repetition of a relatively limited number of stimuli. Finally, a test of covariances indicated no cross-modal relationships between laterality indices suggesting that perceptual biases are dissociable within individuals and cluster on mode of presentation.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Opposite perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks are unique to consonant–vowel strings and are unlikely a consequence of repetition |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1080/1357650x.2024.2348832 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2348832 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
Keywords: | Perceptual biases; laterality; analogous tasks; dichotic listening; visual half-field |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10192118 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |