UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Prospective and Retrospective Measures of Child Maltreatment and Their Association With Psychopathology

Baldwin, Jessie R; Coleman, Oonagh; Francis, Emma R; Danese, Andrea; (2024) Prospective and Retrospective Measures of Child Maltreatment and Their Association With Psychopathology. JAMA Psychiatry 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0818. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Baldwin_Pro retro MH meta-analysis revised draft_240215_clean.pdf]
Preview
Text
Baldwin_Pro retro MH meta-analysis revised draft_240215_clean.pdf

Download (431kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Baldwin_Pro retro MH meta-analysis_SUPPL_240215.pdf]
Preview
Text
Baldwin_Pro retro MH meta-analysis_SUPPL_240215.pdf

Download (764kB) | Preview

Abstract

Importance: Prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment identify largely different groups of individuals. However, it is unclear if these measures are differentially associated with psychopathology. Objective: To analyze the associations of prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment with psychopathology. Data Sources: Based on a preregistered protocol, Embase, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE were searched for peer-reviewed studies published by January 1, 2023, that measured the associations of prospective and retrospective measures of child maltreatment with psychopathology. Study Selection: Titles and abstracts of all articles captured by the search and full texts of potentially eligible studies were independently screened by 2 authors. Observational studies with measures of the association of prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment with psychopathology were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Multiple investigators independently extracted data. Multilevel random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool the results and test predictors of heterogeneity. Main Outcome and Measures: Associations between prospective or retrospective measures of child maltreatment and psychopathology, both unadjusted and adjusted (ie, the association between prospective measures of maltreatment and psychopathology adjusted for retrospective measures, and vice versa), and moderation of these associations by preselected variables. Results: The meta-analyses were based on 24 studies including 15485 individuals (51.0% female; mean age, 21.3 years at retrospective report). Retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment showed stronger associations with psychopathology relative to prospective measures in both unadjusted analyses (retrospective measures: odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95%, 1.94-2.42 vs prospective measures: OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.39-1.76) and adjusted analyses (retrospective measures: OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.90-2.42 vs prospective measures: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41). There was no statistically significant moderation of the unadjusted or adjusted associations between prospective measures of child maltreatment and psychopathology. The associations between retrospective measures and psychopathology were stronger when the assessment of psychopathology was based on self-reports and was focused on internalizing or emotional disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: Psychopathology is more strongly associated with retrospective measures - which capture the first-person, subjective appraisal of childhood events reflected in memory recall - compared to prospective measures - which essentially capture third-person accounts of such events. Maltreatment-related psychopathology may be driven by subjective interpretations of experiences, distressing memories, and associated schemas, which could be targeted by cognitive interventions..

Type: Article
Title: Prospective and Retrospective Measures of Child Maltreatment and Their Association With Psychopathology
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0818
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0818
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: ABUSE, COHORT, CONCORDANCE, DEPRESSION, EXPERIENCES, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, MEMORY, MENTAL-DISORDERS, Psychiatry, RISK, Science & Technology
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10194199
Downloads since deposit
2,460Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item