UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

What do we mean when we say semantic? A multidisciplinary semantic glossary

Reilly, Jamie; Shain, Cory; Borghesani, Valentina; Kuhnke, Philipp; Vigliocco, Gabriella; Peelle, Jonathan E; Mahon, Bradford Z; ... Brysbaert, Marc; + view all (2024) What do we mean when we say semantic? A multidisciplinary semantic glossary. Psychonomic Bullettin & Review 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Green open access

[thumbnail of Vigliocco_What do we mean when we say semantic_s13423-024-02556-7.pdf]
Preview
Text
Vigliocco_What do we mean when we say semantic_s13423-024-02556-7.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Tulving characterized semantic memory as a vast repository of meaning that underlies language and many other cognitive processes. This perspective on lexical and conceptual knowledge galvanized a new era of research undertaken by numerous fields, each with their own idiosyncratic methods and terminology. For example, “concept” has different meanings in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. As such, many fundamental constructs used to delineate semantic theories remain underspecified and/or opaque. Weak construct specificity is among the leading causes of the replication crisis now facing psychology and related fields. Term ambiguity hinders cross-disciplinary communication, falsifiability, and incremental theory-building. Numerous cognitive subdisciplines (e.g., vision, affective neuroscience) have recently addressed these limitations via the development of consensus-based guidelines and definitions. The project to follow represents our effort to produce a multidisciplinary semantic glossary consisting of succinct definitions, background, principled dissenting views, ratings of agreement, and subjective confidence for 17 target constructs (e.g., abstractness, abstraction, concreteness, concept, embodied cognition, event semantics, lexical-semantic, modality, representation, semantic control, semantic feature, simulation, semantic distance, semantic dimension). We discuss potential benefits and pitfalls (e.g., implicit bias, prescriptiveness) of these efforts to specify a common nomenclature that other researchers might index in specifying their own theoretical perspectives (e.g., They said X, but I mean Y).

Type: Article
Title: What do we mean when we say semantic? A multidisciplinary semantic glossary
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7
Language: English
Additional information: © The Author(s), 2025. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10196063
Downloads since deposit
80Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item