UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis

Madigan, Sheri; Deneault, Audrey-Ann; Duschinsky, Robbie; Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J; Schuengel, Carlo; van IJzendoorn, Marinus H; Ly, Anh; ... Verhage, Marije L; + view all (2024) Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 150 (7) pp. 839-872. 10.1037/bul0000433. Green open access

[thumbnail of Sensitivity to Attachment_Madigan et al_PB_2024.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Sensitivity to Attachment_Madigan et al_PB_2024.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (r = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], k = 174, 230 effect sizes, N = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], k = 159, 202 effect sizes, N = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], k = 22, 23 effect sizes, N = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: k = 43, r = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: k = 43, r = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: k = 24, r = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Type: Article
Title: Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000433
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000433
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10196348
Downloads since deposit
2,402Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item