UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Comparative Efficacy of Surgical and Neuromodulatory Strategies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shi, Jianwei; Lu, Dafeng; Wei, Penghu; Yang, Yanfeng; Dong, Hengxin; Jin, Lei; Sander, Josemir W; ... Zhao, Guoguang; + view all (2024) Comparative Efficacy of Surgical and Neuromodulatory Strategies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Manuscript_V1.2_JS_20231019.pdf]
Preview
Text
Manuscript_V1.2_JS_20231019.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulatory strategies for people who have drugresistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods: We searched electronic repositories, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for randomised controlled trials, their ensuing open-label extension studies, and prospective studies focusing on surgical or neuromodulation interventions for people with DRE. We used seizure frequency reduction as the primary outcome. A single-arm meta-analysis synthesised data across all studies to assess treatment effectiveness at multiple time points. A network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of diverse therapies in RCTs. GRADE was applied to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. Results: Twenty-eight studies representing 2936 individuals underwent ten treatments were included. Based on the cumulative ranking in the network meta-analysis, the top three neuromodulatory options were deep brain stimulation (DBS) with 27% probability, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) with 22.91%, and transcranial direct current stimulation with 24.31%. In the single-arm meta-analysis, in the short-to-medium term, seizure control is more effective with RNS than with vagus nerve stimulation (inVNS), which in turn is slightly more effective than DBS, though the differences are minimal. However, in the long term, inVNS appears to be less effective than DBS and RNS. Trigeminal nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial alternating current stimulation did not demonstrate significant seizure frequency reduction. Conclusions: Regarding long-term efficacy, RNS and DBS outperformed inVNS. While transcranial direct current stimulation and transcutaneous auricular VNS showed promise for treating DRE, further studies are needed to confirm their long-term efficacy.

Type: Article
Title: Comparative Efficacy of Surgical and Neuromodulatory Strategies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Publisher version: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/world-neurosurge...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10197831
Downloads since deposit
3Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item