UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

What works and why? Evaluation of a community nutrition programme in Kenya

Havemann, K; Pridmore, P; Tomkins, A; Dandanell, K; (2013) What works and why? Evaluation of a community nutrition programme in Kenya. Journal of Public Health Nutrition , 16 (9) pp. 1614-1621. 10.1017/S1368980012004880. Green open access

[thumbnail of Tomkins_What works and why Evaluation of a community nutrition programme in Kenya.pdf]
Preview
Text
Tomkins_What works and why Evaluation of a community nutrition programme in Kenya.pdf

Download (159kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the nutritional impact of a community-based programme that focused on social cohesion and action. / Design: The change in nutritional status of children aged 12–60 months was examined over a period of 3 years in Makueni District in Eastern Province of Kenya in six communities in which an intervention programme of Participatory Learning and Action was introduced and in ten communities in which only basic preparations were made but no intervention was started. / Setting: The intervention was part of the Government of Kenya Community Based Nutrition Programme and was supported by the Government of Denmark. / Subjects: Children aged 12–60 months. / Results: Among communities without intervention there were similar levels of underweight (mean Z-score: −1·63 v. −1·50 (NS); % with Z-score < –2: 36·6 % v. 34·5 % (NS)) and stunting (mean Z-score: −2·0 v. −1·99 (NS); % with Z-score < –2: 44·3 % and 47·4 % (NS)) at baseline and after 3 years. By contrast, among communities who had received interventions, there were significant improvements after 3 years in the levels of underweight (mean Z-score: −1·66 v. −1·37 (P < 0·02); % with Z-score < –2: 42·9 % v. 31·4 % (P < 0·035)) and stunting (mean Z-score: −2·05 v. −1·59 (P < 0·05); % with Z-score < –2: 52·7 % v. 39·7 % (P < 0·02)). / Conclusions: The results indicate considerable potential for using Participatory Learning and Action as a community-based approach to effectively address child undernutrition. It is suggested that these interventions are developed, implemented and evaluated more widely as a mean of tackling childhood undernutrition and improving child survival and development.

Type: Article
Title: What works and why? Evaluation of a community nutrition programme in Kenya
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012004880
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012004880
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Kenya, Participation, Nutrition, Community, Participatory Learning and Action
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Dept
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10198991
Downloads since deposit
7Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item